User talk:DebiQue

File copyright problem with File:Port imperial 600 w.png

Thank you for uploading File:Port imperial 600 w.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 19:59, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Port imperial 600 w.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Port imperial 600 w.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:21, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed a file deletion tag from File:Port imperial 600 w.png. When removing deletion tags, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:43, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Port imperial 600 w.png

A tag has been placed on File:Port imperial 600 w.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:20, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Port imperial 600 w.png

Thanks for uploading File:Port imperial 600 w.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Off2riorob (talk) 04:48, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

pic update

Hi , I appreciate your attempts at making and releasing this pic under wikipedia compatible licensing - as the pic is now only on a week discussion there is no immediate threat to the pictures status here - it appears the primary issue is now rights - is it your right and ownership to release the satellite picture (which you clearly do not own the legal copyrights to) unless you or your organization own that copyright, then its a composite picture which you would not be able to release under a commons license. Off2riorob (talk) 05:09, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising on Wikipedia

Looking through your edit history, I am noticing a string of attempts to add myracingcareer.com or onlinesportsmanages.com to various Wikipedia articles, specifically circuits or articles on online gaming. Further, your recent image upload has watermarks not listing a creation by you as you claim, but rather a visualization by your website, which really is not something a website can do and serves only to advertise your website. Your editing here should not be based around self promotion. The links you add serve absolutely no purpose other than to repeat information already in our Wikipedia articles, and further they fail the criteria for External Links. The³5₉ (Talk) 05:14, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]