User talk:Deedurden
|
Hi. This is Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a free webhost and not a soapbox. Please keep that in mind when editing. Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 08:31, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
- I'm beginning to suspect that you're WP:NOTHERE to help build the encyclopedia. Kleuske (talk) 09:53, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
ANI Notice
[edit]There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Kleuske (talk) 11:20, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- I thought you wanted me to undo a revision. I am new at this. I use website information with the correct copyrights laws. None of the information is about me. I searched wikipedia for similar subjects such as Jesus, Christ, Messiah, etc. biblical characters in order to create a better format. I have no promotion of myself. How is that possible? I'm finding the information and sharing it on The Hebrew Messiah. Why is that wrong?
--Deedurden (talk) 11:46, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- It is WP:FRINGE material, original research and abuse of Wikipedia as a webhost. Kleuske (talk) 11:48, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
Webhost? WP:FRINGE? WP:OR? AND WP:NOTWEBHOST? Wow! I'm just not aware of how you are arriving at this information. The websites I have cited are from different individuals whom I do not know except for Dr. Billy Graham. I simply research for the naked truth and wish to share it just like all the other Wikipedia users have the liberty to do. Am I allowed to use the Holy Bible Truths? My personal feelings or promotional ones are simply nowhere here. I am a professional. I hold a Bachelor's Degree in Business and Theology and Certification in Counseling. I don't have personal ideas about the Messiah of the HEBREWS. I am just writing the truths that some would rather not hear or see on Wikipedia. The truth doesn't scare me. Truth is all I will write based on credible Evidence and Proof. Isn't that what this is all about? Sharing truths from all sources regardless to who, what, when, where...I do search other pages similar to my subject. I'm in the middle of revisions and hope I can take my time. --Deedurden (talk) 12:15, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is for encyclopedic articles. We don't do "truth", and what you were writing up didn't make any sense anyway. Please see Wikipedia:Truth. Drmies (talk) 21:57, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
October 2018
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bbb23 (talk) 14:23, 6 October 2018 (UTC)Deedurden (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
clearly unfair, accusatory, unjustified hasty block
Decline reason:
Decline: the reason for your block is not addressed; rather, it is denied with an accompanying explanation that indicates user is simply not aware of what Wikipedia is. Drmies (talk) 21:59, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
THANK YOU FOR THE RESPONSES AND INFORMATION. --Deedurden (talk) 22:14, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
Drmies, Thank you so much for your honesty. Your email advising me that Wikipedia is not for TRUTH was very helpful. Since it's basically about lies as you have stated I don't fit here. I just didn't know. I don't do lies. I can understand why it wouldn't make any sense to you. I will keep that in mind when I want dictionary and encyclopedic truths. Please let the world know just where Wikipedia stands. Thanks again. Drmies left a message on your talk page in "ANI Notice". Wikipedia is for encyclopedic articles. We don't do "truth", and what you were writing up didn't make any sense anyway. Please see Wikipedia:Truth.Italic text --Deedurden (talk) 20:08, 7 October 2018 (UTC)