User talk:Dfcy

This is Dfcy's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Just (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Netherzone was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is written like a resume or CV, with a tone that is more promotional than encyclopedic.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Just and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Netherzone (talk) 15:16, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dfcy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Netherzone (talk) 15:16, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Just (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Netherzone was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We do not use MFA email conversations as reliable sources, especially when they link to commercial book seller sites. Also we don't use YouTube as a reliable source. See WP:RS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Just and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Netherzone (talk) 00:55, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Michael Just has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michael Just. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:20, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Few collections publish their artist's names online. Just like universities don't usually publish all of their alumni. Hence, how do you provide evidence of a degree, or for that matter, of a collection? They can be inferred through exhibitions, for which there are references provided. Why does notability hinge on collections? If you're saying they should be removed as no references are provided, I understand that. But this wasn't given as a reason for rejection. I see no promotional style here but would appreciate any help in identifying it. Dfcy (talk) 12:37, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I wanted to let you know I left you two messages on the AFC Help Desk page, which you can find here:[[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#12:07, 26 December 2023 review of submission by Dfcy]]. Don't hesitate to use your own talk page to continue this conversation, just "ping" me to let me know if you want to ask me a question, you do that by typing @Example: but change the word Example to my username which is Netherzone. I'm happy to help out, but know the draft needs a lot of work. You can also use the talk page of the draft for specific questions regarding the Michael Just draft. The talk page is located HERE. Netherzone (talk) 21:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Michael Just

Hello, Dfcy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Michael Just, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]