User talk:Dhastings

Blanking Pages

Please do not blank pages that relate to featured article and good article candidatures. Not only is this a blatant violation of Wikipedia policy, but it also degrades the effort that many editors have put in to help you improve the article you nominated. --mdmanser 02:14, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your message to me

I don't understand what you're talking about? And could you please add new message at the end? If it's difficult for you, you can just click + sign besides the "edit this page" tab to automatically add new section at the end of a talk page. — Indon (reply) — 18:35, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, if you refer to Hastings, Ontario's second GA failed, please take a look at its talk page. I didn't delist it from WP:GAC. Someone else's did. However, I see that you didn't fix the article based on my reviews. If you disagree about my reviews, then you can always submit it into WP:GA/R. Cheers. — Indon (reply) — 18:41, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hastings, ON

I'm incredibly glad that you're so devoted to making this article as good as it can be. Wikipedia could use many, many more dedicated editors such as yourself, and you're doing a great job on the Hastings article. You should definitely keep working, and take some time off before renominating it to be a Good Article; eventually, I'm quite sure it will get there. -- Kicking222 06:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please include 20th centuary history. The media section is too small. Articles should not have stub sections, and things like "Trent Hills has a population of 12,569" need to be sourced. -- Selmo ^(talk) 00:15, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yo might want to merge stub sections into one. Thanks -- Selmo ^(talk) 00:17, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, your first FAC run isn't going perfectly, but I wanted to commend you again for doing a great job on the Hastings article. Assuming it does hit FA status some day, I hope you'll pick another article to do such a thorough job on. -- Kicking222 05:20, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While I'm not such a fan of the repeated GA nominations, I will absolutely give you credit for constantly searching for consensus and trying to get other editors' opinions on the article. WP certainly needs more contributors with both the passion to create better articles and a sense of community. -- Kicking222 20:34, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Dhastings, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page New York Islanders have not conformed to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV), and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Croctotheface 06:48, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Campbellford, Ontario

Thank you for the Help.

Sandbox

Although its the sandbox, don't abuse it-Yancyfry

Dhastings

Please do not hide behind your IP 99.246.178.29 (talk · contribs).

Image:Hastview.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hastview.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:32, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hastdt.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hastdt.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:33, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mayortrenthills.jpeg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mayortrenthills.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Hastingsmap.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hastingsmap.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Has3.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Has3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:35, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia content

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia as you did. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Schutz 00:07, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2006-2007 NHL Team Playoff Run listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2006-2007 NHL Team Playoff Run. Since you had some involvement with the 2006-2007 NHL Team Playoff Run redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:02, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Ontariomap.jpg

The file File:Ontariomap.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:27, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Haslocation.png

The file File:Haslocation.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hastings Memorial Arena

The article Hastings Memorial Arena has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 04:23, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]