User talk:Dilku911

September 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Economy of Sylhet Division—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 07:46, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pune and Pune district, without citing a reliable source. You parked your new number next to citations that supported the old number, making it look as though they supported your new number. That messes up verifiability. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:24, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! -- Toddy1 (talk) 08:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What

What happened Dilku911 (talk) 11:34, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023, you continue to make the same errors

I asked you nicely to use edit summaries, but in your edits to the article on the Economy of Afghanistan you did not bother. This is not OK.-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Economy of Afghanistan, you may be blocked from editing. You have changed lots of numbers, and left your new numbers parked next to the citations for the old numbers. This creates the illusion that your numbers are backed by citations. Please read WP:Verify.-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:13, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No this is real data

real data this is Dilku911 (talk) 12:19, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Readers must be able to check that any of the information within Wikipedia articles is not just made up. This means all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources, and the way to do that is by inline citations. Your edits break the verifiability rule, so they have to be reverted.-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:22, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you decreasing power,

m Dilku911 (talk) 12:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop changing the numbers in vast numbers of articles (including numbers in the URLs). Data in Wikipedia needs to be backed by citations to reliable sources. You are putting your changed numbers next to the citations that support the old numbers.-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Economy of the United States. -- Toddy1 (talk) 12:35, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Patna. -- Toddy1 (talk) 12:43, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Economy of Gujarat. -- Toddy1 (talk) 12:57, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Economy of the United Kingdom. -- Toddy1 (talk) 14:49, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to change the numbers in articles dealing with economic matters, you need to:

Look at sources,
Change the numbers to the numbers in the sources
Make sure that the description of the new numbers reflects the sources you used
Provide citations to the sources, so that people can verify that the numbers are right

You are not doing these things. You are just changing numbers. Stop it.-- Toddy1 (talk) 04:56, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:54, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making changes to details in articles with no reliable source and despite warnings on this talk page. See the report at ANI. The three comments made on this page do not show an ability to communicate effectively..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Johnuniq (talk) 09:31, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]