User talk:Dingolover6969

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Dingolover6969. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Doug Weller talk 09:32, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Terror (TV series

A tag has been placed on The Terror (TV series requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:45, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Big Floppa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gosha. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dracula

Hey! I just wanted to say I reverted most of your edits on the article per the sources available. You mention a 1993 DVD (?) for your source, but The film was only released on VHS by that time, can you tell me some specifics? I've removed the Spanish-language part of the lead, as I feel the second paragraph in the lead explains the Spanish-language situation a bit better for unfamiliar readers. Thoughts? Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:18, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! After I submitted that edit note, I realized that I typo'd the date on the DVD. I just have a regular DVD copy from the year the DVD release was made (or, presumably, a re-release of that same content from a later year)--I can double-check the date on the box later.

There is possibly a deeper issue that I don't know how to deal with: I have no way to verify that the cast title card of the DVD is equivalent (ie, has the character name "Drácula" spelled the same way) to the title card of the original theatrical release of the spanish-language Dracula. In fact, the copyright notice is on that card, and that's when I noticed the copyright notice was from the '90s instead of the '30s, in the first place. I don't know how relevant that is, or how worried I should be about it. I wouldn't want to contribute to revisionist history about how to spell spanish Dracula's name, but if his name really has had an accent mark in it the whole time, it would be good to include that detail on the page. The sources are mixed about this, and I don't think any make definitive statements on the matter. It's very common for English language sources to simply drop accent marks out of names for typographical convenience; similarly, it would be quite possible for someone with a familiarity with the Spanish language to simply add an accent mark to the appropriate place once they had heard the pronunciation of "Dracula" in the film; so I don't think either the sources with or without accents in Dracula's name are definitive proof of anything. But the DVD having an accent on Drácula's name is pretty suggestive.

A similar worry also applies to other character names, although less so... I find it difficult to believe that the film would in dialogue refer to a character as "Lucía Westron", as this film does, but refer to her character name officially as "Lucy Westerna" on a title card or elsewhere; I find it far more likely that when and if a secondary source refers to this character as "Lucy Westerna", they are speaking metonymically, as Lucía Westron is based on Lucy Westenra.

Regarding the title of the film, however, I think it's pretty clear in any case that the lede should include ", also called Drácula,", because a fair number of the sources already cited on the page use that title, and Wikipedia usually lists not only the most common or official title for something but also any other common names for it.

Moving about the qualification / explanation of Spanish-language is fine by me; I thought perhaps it should be in the first sentence because it's one of the features that most usefully distinguishes it from the other Dracula film of the same year, but I don't have very strong feelings about it.

Those are all my thoughts, of both immediate and questionable usefulness :). Perhaps I should have put these on the page's talk page. I would be happy to hear any thoughts you have on these subjects, as well. Dingolover6969 (talk) 03:59, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Andrzejbanas: Checking now, I find that my DVD box ("Universal Studios Classic Monster Collection: Dracula", online listings available on Amazon and DVDs 'n such) lists copyright 1931, 1999. The opening title card ('Carl Laemmle presenta "Dracula"', etc) lists a copyright of 1992. (The copyright text doesn't flicker slightly like the main text, and is in a different font, suggesting it's been superimposed on the original title card—although, we already knew this.) Presumably the 1992 copyright is from the 1992, which was used for the VHS version and later this DVD version, and the 1999 copyright is for the DVD release itself. Hope that clears that up! Dingolover6969 (talk) 05:15, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Code2000 update

James Kass requested update even further, and you still do not know it:

HOWTO: https://www.code2001.com/Code2000_Wikipedia_update.txt

REQUEST: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Code2000&oldid=1055684985#Updated_information

Please fulfill his request on this editprotected page, thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.26.156.111 (talk) 07:58, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks for bringing this to my attention. However, I am not involved involved enough with the page's unique history and context to feel able to resolve the situation confidently. Good luck! Dingolover6969 (talk) 10:16, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps the best way for James to make information available to Wikipedia would be to talk to some publications, such as, uh, typography and computing magazines(?), which could then publish the information, which Wikipedia could then cite. Dingolover6969 (talk) 10:21, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but you placed in Code2000 fake link to fake impostor website, while real homepage of James is here: https://www.code2001.com Please fix these lies, ASAP! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.26.156.111 (talk) 11:57, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Look, fonts are developed through end of 2022 year, even into having NEW Code2003 font in its family: https://www.code2001.com/#dn And now Wikipedia still cites some fraudster. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.26.156.111 (talk) 12:05, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, you know, yeah, I should do something about that. I will do so in a while. Dingolover6969 (talk) 19:17, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Even if all other wikis Wikidata:Q1105549 already updated their Code2000 articles, leading English wiki still is obsolete in regard to it. How long will take this "while" in article link update? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.26.156.111 (talk) 08:27, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, probably a couple days so I can cross-reference the sites and see what's up. I should be done in no more than a week, if I figure out what to do at all. I've removed the reference to the imposter current code2000.net to tide you over ;) Dingolover6969 (talk) 09:47, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, ok, I put in a link to code2001.com because it's a good website, and removed the link to code2000.net because it's a bad website, but I didn't do any of the other proposed changes mostly because I can't vet the information about fonts (ie, presumably the font file itself is a fine source about whether it supports, say Balinese script, but it would be painstaking for me personally to verify this). I decided this almost immediately, but waited to see if I changed my mind about it—I have not. Dingolover6969 (talk) 09:14, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dracula (1931 Spanish-language film) credits (from DVD).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dracula (1931 Spanish-language film) credits (from DVD).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:08, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, that's fine. I assume no one will see this message so I'm mostly making it as a note to my future self: This was expected and proper. Dingolover6969 (talk) 07:33, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to COVID-19, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Andre🚐 04:49, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, I'm Andrevan. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Andre🚐 04:50, 10 August 2023 (UTC) (Note, I see you did an leave an edit summary but you still removed sourced content and your reasoning wasn't valid, thanks.)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Book of Lamentations (Kriss)

Hello, Dingolover6969

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Justiyaya, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Book of Lamentations (Kriss), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Justiyaya}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Justi yaya 08:44, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Solitaire (solitaire)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Solitaire (solitaire) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 5 § Solitaire (solitaire) until a consensus is reached. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 04:06, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Script forms of letters

When you are adding material about the mathematical lettering, you really should explain it because the vast majority of readers don't understand the details. I suggest you use something like this:

script letter P (uppercase and lowercase, respectively), used in mathematics. (In other contexts, a script typeface (or computer font) should be used.)

You are doing a lot of these and you shouldn't leave it to other editors to add the clarification. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 16:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. Dingolover6969 (talk) 20:46, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]