User talk:DoctorWikipedia

November 2016

Hello, I'm Wikishovel. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Doctor Who tie-in websites have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Wikishovel (talk) 15:24, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Doctor Who tie-in websites. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Doctor Who tie-in websites was changed by DoctorWikipedia (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956555 on 2016-11-17T20:21:02+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:21, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Doctor Who tie-in websites, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Doctor Who tie-in websites was changed by DoctorWikipedia (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951615 on 2016-11-19T19:07:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:07, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Your recent editing history at Twelfth Doctor shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Alex|The|Whovian^? 03:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, DoctorWikipedia. You have new messages at Talk:Twelfth Doctor.
Message added 03:17, 31 January 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Alex|The|Whovian^? 03:17, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Doctorwho1212.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Doctorwho1212.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:30, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, I'm DonQuixote. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Doctor Who (series 10), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonQuixote (talk) 00:05, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dan Koehl. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Doctor Who (series 10) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Dan Koehl (talk) 19:03, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonQuixote (talk) 00:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did to Doctor Who (series 10). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DonQuixote (talk) 02:52, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. BlueBlue11 (talk) 12:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please review identifying reliable sources. Also, a helpful rule-of-thumb is that reliable sources have a reputation for fact-checking (newspapers, magazines, etc.) and/or peer-review (professional journals). DonQuixote (talk) 23:46, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Doctor Who (series 10). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. BlueBlue11 (talk) 22:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Pilot (Doctor Who)

Hi. I've made a draft article for the first episode of series 10. Feel free to edit it, but only move it into the mainspace when it has enough info and a consensus to move it has been achieved. Thank you. Ted Edwards 19:34, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]