User talk:DogoMan900

Welcome!

Hello, DogoMan900, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! – XLinkBot (talk) 02:06, 25 April 2016 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

April 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Dank memes has been reverted.
Your edit here to Dank memes was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/groups/berniesandersmemes/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:06, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello

Please stop reverting my edits. If you want to undo them and add sources please do, otherwise what I removed should stay removed due to being either too general, unsourced, or written poorly. Thanks. HarryKernow (talk to me) 16:45, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Dank Memes

You seem to be new here so I just wanted to share some tips on the situation with Dank memes. I'm a redditor myself - I know the subculture and I love it dearly - but there are some things that just don't belong in an encyclopedia, and I flagged the article for deletion because because I'm not seeing a saving grace here. You're welcome to prove those in favor of deletion wrong - if you find some acceptable sources, then you would have a better case for saving it - but Facebook pages and a subreddit of 30k users aren't indications of notability on their own. It would take a significant amount of original research to stretch it out into a decent article with these kinds of sources, and 4chan and Know Your Meme aren't the kind of credible websites that you can directly draw references from to establish a case for an article. Content on Wikipedia is more or less an aggregation of secondary coverage, something that does not consist of social media posts or the speculation of the authors writing the article. The exclusion of topics which are not readily verifiable is part of what keeps Wikipedia's content fairly dependable. Keep this in mind going forward.

Another thing I'd like to point out is that you were engaging in an edit war with HarryKernow. This is not acceptable behavior here and, in doing so, you have technically violated the three revert rule which is a common way to be temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia. I'm not going to say anything this time but I will ask that you don't do this again as it may only hinder your case or your ability to save an endangered page from the axe. ProtossPylon 23:49, 25 April 2016 (UTC)