User talk:Dolphinlover222

Dolphinlover222, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Dolphinlover222! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Indonesia Women's National Volleyball Team (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The following sentence appears to be commentary in the voice of Wikipedia: "At the 2015 Southeast Asian Games volleyball competition, player Aprilia Santini Manganang received negative reactions both on and off the court, due to the crowd questioning her gender. A gender test was conducted to make sure that she was eligible to play. She didn't let this negativity affect her playing however, and lead her Indonesian team to a win against the Philippines. Before the match had started, there was a protest about the players appearance but it was rejected. When the crowd booed her during her plays, she became even more motivated to perform well." It should be trimmed, and attributed to reliable sources, such as newspapers or magazines, tht have reported on the championship, and put into a more formal tone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Indonesia Women's National Volleyball Team and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:10, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Colleen Houck (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft does not yet show whether the subject meets the author inclusion criteria, and the references are not to the required reliable, independent (third-party) sources that discuss the subject in significant detail. Goodreads is not a reliable source as anyone can publish a review there. Rather, references should demonstrate whether the author has received significant critical attention. References from national newspapers or literary publications would fit the bill. If such sources do not exist, then the subject is likely not ready for its own Wikipedia article at this time. Thanks,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Colleen Houck and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wiae /tlk 18:55, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Colleen Houck has been accepted

Colleen Houck, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:15, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Indonesia Women's National Volleyball Team

Hello, Dolphinlover222. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Indonesia Women's National Volleyball Team".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 18:22, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]