User talk:Dongoodes

Welcome!

Hello, Dongoodes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like St. Elijah Pioneer Church Museum, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RA (talk) 22:05, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of St. Elijah Pioneer Church Museum

A tag has been placed on St. Elijah Pioneer Church Museum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RA (talk) 22:05, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antonietta Grassi (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We read that Grassi's works are in the collections of [...] Musée d’arts contemporains de Baie-Saint-Paul, Global Affairs Canada, Groupe Desjardins, Stewart Hall Art Gallery in Pointe Claire, Conseil des Arts et Lettres du Québec, Capital One, Boston Public Library, Archives of Ontario, Yamana Gold, Museo MAACK Kalenarte [...] Evidence for each of these, please. (There's no pressing need to say that they're also in numerous private and corporate collections; but if you want to say this, it too needs to be backed up with references.) Plenty of other material here is also unreferenced, e.g. the whole of the section "Art practice". Make sure that it all comes with references to reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Antonietta Grassi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 12:02, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dongoodes! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hoary (talk) 12:02, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dongoodes (talk) 20:43, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello scope_creep, thank you for your revision and for your comments. I have removed much unreferenced material, added many references and have reorganized and edited the text following your comments. Thank you for taking another look.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antonietta Grassi (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A large section and a sentence about the subject qualification remain unsourced. The subject is notable, but as a WP:BLP the content needs sourcing. Add it in and ping me when your done.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Antonietta Grassi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 13:58, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Scope creep. Thanks you for reviewing the Antonietta Grassi article. I worked on it today adding more references and taking out some information that I could not properly reference. You asked me to ping you when that was done. I am not sure if this is the proper place to do that, but if it is I would appreciate if you could give me further feedback. Dongoodes (talk) 16:54, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dongoodes (talk) 16:56, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Scope creep. Thanks you for reviewing the Antonietta Grassi article. I worked on it today adding more references and taking out some information that I could not properly reference. I would like to resubmit. You asked me to ping you when that was done. I am not sure if this is the proper place to do that, but if it is I would appreciate if you could give me further feedback.

Hi @Dongoodes: Resubmit it and I'll re-review it. It certainly looks a lot better and looks ready for mainspace. scope_creep^Talk 20:27, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dongoodes: I had a look at this yesterday. The references on the article are enough to show the article is notable, but there is another problem and that is around bare url's, WP:BAREURLS. Can you convert the references into full citations. Take a look at WP:REFB which is a small tutorial on how to do it. If you need a hand give me a shout. scope_creep^Talk 08:12, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Scope creep: I reformatted all the references in the Antonietta Grassi article. If I understood correctly the urls must appear after url=. Is that correct? Could you take a look? I would appreciate that. If there are further problems, I look forward to hearing all about them :-) For one thing, I didn't know if it was okay to use ibid and op.cit. for web references. I suspect they are limited to books... Anyway hoping everything is in order now. Thanks! Dongoodes (talk) 02:55, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dongoodes: That is much better looking now and ready for mainspace. scope_creep^Talk 08:09, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dongoodes: I've mainspaced it. It pretty decents. Ibids and op. cites aren't used here. Ibids are certainly. I think they are going out of fashion. Full citations on every please. scope_creep^Talk 08:13, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antonietta Grassi has been accepted

Antonietta Grassi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creep^Talk 08:10, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much to you scope creep. Appreciate that you stuck with me to get this article up to standard. I learned a lot. Dongoodes (talk) 22:56, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]