User talk:Donovan O'Cooley

Donovan O'Cooley, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Donovan O'Cooley! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Note

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:26, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Office of Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement

It looks to me as though you removed sourced material in error. Take a look at WP:LEAD. Sources don't always have to be in the lead. The editor who put the text back has self-reverted, but I'm wondering if you still stand by your revert? This just seems to be the sort of error I made when I was new. Doug Weller talk 11:16, 3 April 2017 (UTC)