User talk:DrIsaiahRoy

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Society for Mountain Medicine (April 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RoySmith were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There were two sources added since this was last declined. One is a link to the subject's own website. The other is a passing mention. Please see WP:NCORP

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:International Society for Mountain Medicine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:International Society for Mountain Medicine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 18:46, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RoySmith, the sources are reliable, and are independent. I have added some more, but I would ask you to review the links provided more carefully. For example, Mary-Ann Liebert, the publisher of the peer-reviewed ISMM scientific journal and a well-known, completely independent publisher of hundreds of medical journals and a reliable source to validate the existence of this organization. Their website mentions the ISMM literally hundreds of times (use the following Google search query for evidence: "International Society for Mountain Medicine" site:liebertpub.com), but linking to all these pages shouldn't be necessary. Regarding reliability, surely, you are not suggesting that the hundreds of articles published in the ISMM Journal with this independent publisher over the course of 21 years constitutes unreliable proof. I appreciate your close attention to the content on the linked websites which are beyond a doubt reliable and independent.

AfC notification: Draft:International Society for Mountain Medicine has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:International Society for Mountain Medicine. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 02:03, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Society for Mountain Medicine (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:International Society for Mountain Medicine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:International Society for Mountain Medicine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 09:06, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DrIsaiahRoy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 09:06, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]