User talk:DrJoseV

Welcome!

Hello, DrJoseV, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Vsmith (talk) 22:22, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Popecol, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

MrOllie (talk) 17:43, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 23:38, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As a researcher, of course I will be contributing to topics that I am knowledgeable in, which is the point of Wikipedia. I have added new and relevant information to all the pages I have posted in. Although I have added my own citations, especially in the case when they are the only ones available, I have also made sure to add a lot of references from others. In some cases, I have added my references where they specifically asked for references. However, I didn't realize that if I was going to be adding my own references I had to ask by posting on the talk page another contributor could review whether they should add it themselves. I thought that since I was adding valuable references, even though they were my own, it would be appreciated, especially in the case where it was the only scientific reference available, and since I was also adding references from other researchers as well when available. Also, I originally had an account with my name but decided it would be best to be anonymous so I created another account. Since I would forget my accounts when I signed out or forget my password I would create others. I probably have others besides the ones cited that I forgot about. I also wasn't sure how to use wikipedia and wouldn't know I had messages. I only realized later one when I found that my posts were deleted. However, I understand now the importance of socking and how it affects wikipedia. Nevertheless, I will no longer be adding anything that will be considered self promotion, and instead ask to request an edit by others if I think it can be of value. From now on I will post to correct and add new knowledge and include only references from other researchers. I want to use my expert knowledge to contribute to Wikipedia and its goals. Please let me know what are the next steps I can take to be an expert editor for Wikipedia. DrJoseV (talk) 14:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]