User talk:Dr Dima

Thanks for the answer on atomic orbitals. My exam is tomorrow, so I have no time left to do the reading work :-) The rest was quite useful though.

indeed thanx for ur answer on sound and heat topic ,actually i m trying to experiment the transmission of heat in normal air and transmission of heat through air in presence of sound of various frequencies/amplitude.

reveal.mystery

many many thanks for your support. let me explain what actually i tried for: considering the wave nature of em waves i considered the interaction of the magnetic component of the wave with the metallic surface.now further on by applying lenzs law i propose the generation of an opposite directioned current in the plate.the interaction of the orginal and the field generated by lenzs law finally proves my point.

please helpme so that i may further more proceed in this area.basically i require it to be recognized by some university professor or any journal.since the subject dosent pertains to my branch ,such recognition would help me in my resume for my gre(M tech) interview.

Reveal.mystery (talk) 2nd year,Mechanical Engineering student sam54in1@gmail.com india —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reveal.mystery (talk • contribs) 12:38, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

i am really in need of some support s please reply me soon.

Dear Reveal.mystery. Unfortunately, I have no means of "recognizing" you or recommending you to anyone or in any way. Please accept my apologies. --Dr Dima (talk) 06:02, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What a fine response![edit]

Chapeau, dear Dr, for the links and line of thinking you provided in your resonse to this latest query from a "no-account user" who seems to have an agenda and is contentious in the bargain. I couldn't have done as well and certainly no better, so am refraining from chiming in there at this point. Still, I appreciate reading what you've written, and welcome your further participation on the Humanities Ref Desk, with your personal combination of "brain+research" ;-) -- Cheers, Deborahjay (talk) 07:49, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reference desk barnstar[edit]

		The Reference Desk Barnstar
		Thanks for helping me identify those spiders (yes there were more than one under the sofa). Jolly Ω Janner 01:24, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Seems like it's a question for you[1]....--Gilisa (talk) 12:48, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rendering of an [sic] Hebrew word in English letters[edit]

Shalom, Dr D! In your response to the above Language RD query, you wrote:

By the way, ריקבון only means bacterial decay, rot. There are different Hebrew words for different meanings of "decay".

What I'd like to know:

Is the figurative sense not used in Hebrew, e.g. "moral decay" (as I suggested, and will correct if necessary)?
Which other words did you have in mind, and for what contexts?

I'm not a native speaker myself and my acquired Hebrew is largely unschooled. Perhaps the figurative usage with which I'm familiar is ironic or otherwise colloquial; nevertheless I got the idea from your remark that perhaps this is a scientific term? I'd apprciate the clarification. -- Deborahjay (talk) 12:22, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Reference Desk/Science#Fungus[edit]

Why did you include saponification in the list of decay processes? It has to do with the hydrolysis of a fatty ester. Thank you. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 01:09, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your expertise[edit]

I appreciate the help you gave me in identifying two "mystery" plants at the Reference Desk. Thank you for your time and expertise. Alanraywiki (talk) 20:11, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you![edit]

Heya, I just wanted to say thank you for taking the time to answer the question I posted on the science reference desk a couple of days ago. So, yeah — thanks! :) -- Schneelocke (talk) 00:55, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

your helpful answer on "beneficial cancers?" at reference desk[edit]

thanks, it answered the question, and also helped me to see how i could have phrased my question more clearly in the first place.76.218.104.120 (talk) 15:30, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Let we have

Mass M = 5.97219 x 10^24 kilograms

Mass m = 7.34767309 × 10^22 kilograms

Radius of Mass M; R = 6371 km

Radius of Mass m; r = 1737 km

O/C distance between M and m = 8608 km

Acceleration due to gravity of mass M = g1 = GM/R^2

Acceleration due to gravity of mass m = g2 = Gm/r^2

G = 6.67408 × 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2

Both M and m are spherical in shape. This means the surface-to-surface distance between M and m = 500 km. Let X be the point on the center-to-center distance of 8608 km where both M and m strike each other due to Newton’s law of gravitation (F = GMm/d^2).

Calculate the location of point X on aforementioned o/c distance, final velocities of M and m at the time of voilent touching M and m and striking time of both M and m? Thanks 2001:56A:7399:1200:1CF7:7420:91FC:7D91 (talk) 18:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)EEK[reply]

I'm very sorry, but we have a policy against answering homework questions. All the best, Dr Dima (talk) 02:07, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FYI - I am not a student, however, its your choice if you don't want to answer.

regarding LS & jj couplings[edit]

I hope it's o.k. to remind you our conversation regarding these couplings, in HelpDesk, 26 March 2019, especially due to the fact that stuff is quite frequently moved and archived. I've just added a question there, and another one a few days ago. Please be kind to also look up a question with respect to selection rules, a few minutes ago, on the current board (3 April 2019). All the best, בנצי (talk) 14:02, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]