User talk:Dzkazic

Speedy deletion nomination of Special Regiment force

A tag has been placed on Special Regiment force, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:41, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bosnian Navy and Bosnian Coast Guard

The article Bosnian Navy and Bosnian Coast Guard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No content - only information box. This may however be under a revamp.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James Brian Ellis (talk) 10:17, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bosnian Special Regiment Force

A tag has been placed on Bosnian Special Regiment Force, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Hoax. No such unit exists, nor the 'Bosnian Special Operations Division.' Copied from German Army Kommando Spezialkräfte article

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Buckshot06 (talk) 18:14, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Dzkazic, you have twice tried to create an article about a unit that does not exist. You are risking a block, which may be quite lengthy. As soon as possible, place a response on my talkpage explaining what you are doing and why, please. Buckshot06 (talk) 18:16, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for for creating yet another useless article (Wisland) and vandalizing the article on Norway. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 12:06, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Objekat 101 for deletion

The article Objekat 101 is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Objekat 101 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Marcus Qwertyus 21:45, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Objekat 101

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Objekat 101, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:55, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Do not create, add, or restore hoaxes to Wikipedia., such as you did with the article Objekat 101. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:47, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]