User talk:Eclipse Anesthesia

This user may have left Wikipedia. Eclipse Anesthesia has not edited Wikipedia since 26 December 2016. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, Eclipse Anesthesia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

images

There is no earthly point in saying permission letter on file if you then tag the image, such as Image:AANAMcgee.jpg with {{db-noncom}}. And have you lodged a copy of the permission with "permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org"? -- RHaworth 10:27, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:AANAHodgins.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:AANAHodgins.jpg. However, Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. cohesion 03:53, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nurse anesthetist

Hi. I notice you haven't replied to my comment on the talk page on 13th May. It's essential that this page (as with any other) is comprehensively referenced. So far this has not been the case, despite my repeated comments. As you are the principal author of the article, responsible for much of its content, the onus is on you to provide these references. This is the best way we have of creating a good encyclopaedia and putting an end to the constant jostling for position between different political persuasions on this article. Please recondsider quoting your references, or I will start to remove unsupported content. --John24601 14:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that you're busy, as are we all, and I'm sorry if I came across as rude, that wasn't my intention. However, the whole article (including the history section) does need to be referenced, and so the tag is entirely appropriate. The onus is not on readers to go and find sources to check information, its for the author to provide these sources. Wikipedia policy clearly states that unsupported material can be removed by any editor without warning: I've tried to be reasonable to avoid destroying the article, but we can't continue in limbo. You might like to read WP:V. As for my thoughts on the topic: I'm actually a big advocate of advanced nursing practice, and have several published lit reviews and research papers on the subject; I also hold no ill feeling towards americans. I do, on the other hand, want to create a good encyclopedia. :) --John24601 20:58, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Nurse anesthetist. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Fuzbaby (talk) 19:16, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Nurse anesthetist. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Fuzbaby (talk) 01:31, 15 June 2009 (UTC) Please stop assuming ownership of articles such as Nurse anesthetist. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to a block from editing. Fuzbaby (talk) 01:31, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nurse anesthetist. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Fuzbaby (talk) 06:02, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eclipse Anesthesia for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuzbaby (talk • contribs) 02:18, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Sister Mary Bernard.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sister Mary Bernard.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:11, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Agnes Mcgee.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Agnes Mcgee.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 07:10, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Agatha Hodgins.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Agatha Hodgins.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 07:12, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Alice Hunt.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Alice Hunt.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 07:13, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. However, I noticed that your username (Eclipse Anesthesia) may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it Your username appears to represent a group, company, or organization.. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 19:19, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 27, 2011.

I've changed the "scope of practice" section of the nurse anesthestist article, however, I've only changed the first paragraph, which includes the important sentence about independent practice. The independent practice of the CRNA is an important and unique feature of the CRNA which should be highlighted. While I appreciate your contribution, it is ambigious when it comes to the full -service capabilities of the CRNA. Please leave a message on my talk page if you disagree. JadamR15 (talk) 08:46, 27 February 2011 (UTC)JadamR15[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Eclipse Anesthesia. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Sister Mary Bernard.jpg

The file File:Sister Mary Bernard.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]