User talk:Elmi24

CS1 error on Menelik II

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Menelik II, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm Egsan Bacon. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Menelik II have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Egsan Bacon (talk) 00:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Egsan Bacon,

Thank you for your message. I appreciate your diligence in maintaining the integrity of the content. However, I understand the importance of ensuring accuracy and constructive contributions. I will review the guidelines and make necessary adjustments to my edits accordingly. If you have any further questions or suggestions, please feel free to let me know. Thank you for your assistance. Elmi24 (talk) 01:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's quite audacious for a European to dare lecture an African on what's deemed constructive regarding a Wikipedia page concerning an African leader. You might want to reconsider your stance before you find yourself on the wrong side of history Elmi24 (talk) 01:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose different people find different things "audacious". One thing that I find audacious, for example, is when someone makes edits that include changes like altering quotes from “This country is mine and no other nation can have it” to “This country is not mine and any other nation can have it” and “Ethiopia has been for fourteen centuries a Christian island in a sea of pagans” to “Ethiopia has been for fourteen centuries a back water Christian nation in a sea of sharks” and then suggesting that objections to that are somehow based off racial or geographic animus. That is quite audacious indeed. Additionally, making assumptions about where someone is from is pretty audacious when it comes down it. Egsan Bacon (talk) 20:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]