User talk:Elohim55

Welcome

Hello Elohim55 and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to the page User talk:RHaworth, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Joseph2302 (talk) 14:26, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What's your gripe?

I am tempted to block you as a sock puppet. Your fluency in wikispeak clearly suggests that you have been here before under a different name. So instead of vandalising my user talk page, why don't you tell me what I have done to annoy you? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:48, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Royalmate1 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 16:52, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elohim55 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not in any way a sockpuppet. My edits are my own and I am in fact a personal friend of the user in question. Please revoke my block. My account was created at a separate IP address (our school's) if you care abotu that kind of stuff. 72.189.174.38 (talk) 00:55, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Firstly, an unblock request should be made by the logged-in editor. Secondly, there's both technical and behavioural evidence linking you to Royalmate1. Thirdly, this account's edits would be grounds enough for a block on their own. Huon (talk) 01:13, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.