User talk:Energizedsoul

October 2019

Hello, I'm Noq. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Gul Ahmed, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The updated URL you supplied only shows an error page. noq (talk) 10:29, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Gul Ahmed, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Störm (talk) 08:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 08:51, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Energizedsoul (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Concern, Kindly unblock my account and also review the changes which were made at Gul Ahmed page. Information was taken from their audited and published annual accounts book which is available on their website as well. Reference for citation and review was also given accordingly. URL is also valid and functional "http://gulahmed.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/GTML_2018-1.pdf". I am unable to understand why the content is being reverted every time despite of giving proper reference. Kindly unblock my account and also let me know the reason for content being reverted. Regards, Energizedsoul (talk) 09:13, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Nick-D (talk) 03:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do you have a connection to Gul Ahmed? 331dot (talk) 10:15, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not Directly.

Please ensure that any future unblock requests are in line with WP:COI. Nick-D (talk) 03:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. I fully understand the norms of wikipedia and the intent of making changes wasn't against to it. I humbly request again to review the contents of the changes from the references given. Their annual audited book of 2017-18 which is currently used as a reference on wikipedia from their website gulahmed.com is also having their annual audited book of 2018-19 which is containing updated figures and information. this is again humbly requested to look into it. Thanks & Regards.

You will need to make another unblock request. 331dot (talk) 14:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Energizedsoul (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Concern, Kindly unblock my account and also review the changes which were made at Gul Ahmed page. Information was taken from their audited and published annual accounts book which is available on their website as well. Reference for citation and review was also given accordingly. URL is also valid and functional "http://gulahmed.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/GTML_2018-1.pdf". Kindly unblock my account. Regards, Energizedsoul Energizedsoul (talk) 05:17, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 15:51, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS 29190

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Energizedsoul (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #29190 was submitted on 2020-02-27 18:08:40. This review is now closed.

Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:17, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 29301

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Energizedsoul (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #29301 was submitted on 2020-03-05 05:02:20. This review is now closed.

--Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 09:54, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]