User talk:Englishenglishenglish

Proposed deletion of Jalebi Bai

Hello, Englishenglishenglish. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Jalebi Bai, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Wgolf (talk) 20:24, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jalebi Bai for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jalebi Bai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jalebi Bai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 20:44, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

Information added to articles must be verifiable through reliable sources. Please time a few minute to read through both of those articles for what's needed. Ravensfire (talk) 17:12, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 16:22, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Suicide of Jiah Khan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Suicide of Jiah Khan, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of Uncited cut'n'paste from WP's article on the subject. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Jiah Khan. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Jiah Khan, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DMacks (talk) 16:31, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of BUNK'D for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BUNK'D is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BUNK'D until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Philip J Fry • (talk) 06:47, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Hello, I'm Non-dropframe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Singh Is Bliing— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Non-Dropframe _talk 18:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Adam DeVine, you may be blocked from editing. Deli nk (talk) 19:32, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic edits

Hi, I've noticed a few of your recent edits have been problematic, and I need to bring them to your attention. In this edit you removed an article's reference section with no justification. You also removed a reference without explanation and added unsourced content. In this edit you add unsourced speculative content about what the film was based on. The community is not interested in our personal evaluations. In this edit you add a plot summary that can be found here and here. I don't especially care where you got the content, but you may not copy large passages of content from other sites into Wikipedia. Please note that when taken on a whole, many of your recent edits have been problematic for one reason or another. Please don't add unsourced content, please don't copy prose from other sites, please double-check your edits before clicking save by using the "Show preview" button located right next to the "Save page" button. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm Hello71. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Prem Ratan Dhan Payo with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ⁓ Hello 71 16:09, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. Galaxy Kid (talk) 16:11, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]