User talk:Eshqinra
May 2018
[edit]
Hello, I'm Safety Cap. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Novruz Mammadov— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Safety Cap (talk) 17:54, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
October 2018
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ismail I. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. - LouisAragon (talk) 11:41, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
December 2018
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nasir al-Din al-Tusi, you may be blocked from editing. He was not "Azerbaijani" but Persian. there was no "Azerbaijanis" 1000 years ago and there are literally 10 sources supporting his Persian ethnicity in the lead. ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 16:41, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Qatran Tabrizi. Same goes here ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 16:44, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
June 2019
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Snowflake91 (talk) 09:16, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |