User talk:EthanA2020

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Septrillion. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Batman: Arkham Knight have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Septrillion (talk) 22:44, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Spelling bee. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Septrillion (talk) 22:47, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 22:48, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EthanA2020 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My intent was not to vandalise articles. I just created the account to test out if it actually worked. I'm sorry for any trouble I caused and sorry about "Vandalising" the article. I will not do this again. EthanA2020 (talk) 23:00, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Somehow that doesn't agree with your conduct. Note the deceptive edit summary. Huon (talk) 23:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pls unblok

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EthanA2020 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

user:huon mentioned deceptive edit summary. I was seeing if it would work. I'm brand new to Wikipedia, i thought it wouldnt even go through without approval. i didn't think it would matter what edit summary it was. This is supposed to be a "creative commons", but I don't see anything about commons. I wanted to test if it would work so I made a quick edit added some random stuff in the summary because i didn't even think it would work. I didn't mean to vandalise and I apologise. Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

So, after using a deceptive edit summary (because it wouldn't matter?!? so you lied) and vandalising, even though you didn't mean to vandalise (ahem, yeah right), you saw that this resulted in damage to the Wikipedia and so stopped immediately. Oh. Wait. No, you continued attacking Wikipedia. No, the block is appropriate and your excuses won't fly here. Yamla (talk) 01:20, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This sort of garbage shows you have no intention of contributing productively. Don't do that again, and don't modify existing declines for your block reviews. Otherwise, I'll shut down your access to this talk page. --Yamla (talk) 13:04, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have now lost access to this talk page. --Yamla (talk) 13:09, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]