User talk:Evagolinger1

Copyright problems with Eva Golinger

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Eva Golinger, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/Golinger.shtml. As a copyright violation, Eva Golinger appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Eva Golinger has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Eva Golinger and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Eva Golinger with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Eva Golinger.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. JNW (talk) 19:40, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. JNW (talk) 19:40, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

I see a COI tag notice has already been added here: please make article suggestions on article talk pages. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:25, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Here you removed a COI tag with an edit summary indicating you were adding content; perhaps an error? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:27, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Also, please see Wikipedia:USERNAME#Real names. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:33, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

This information is false, and cited only to self at Venezuelanalysis.com; see The Daily Journal. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:50, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

change was accurate, not deceptive

The Daily Journal no longer exists in Venezuela. Therefore, the Correo del Orinoco International is the only English-language newspaper in Venezuela, and the first created during the Chavez administration. I was not lying! ˜˜˜˜ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Evagolinger1 (talk • contribs) 19:01, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

No, it was not accurate; it was not the "first English-language newspaper" in Venezuela, and you should very well know that (as Venezuelanalysis must have known that when they wrote that false headline). If you can't edit correctly with your COI, then please make your suggestions on talk, not to the article. You do not need to post to my talk-- I am following your talk page. "First created during the Chavez administration" is irrelevant except to the myopic. As to whether you were "lying", I did not use those words: I'll leave that to your own conscience. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:06, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Misleading edit summaries

Lying in an edit summary to misrepresent the nature of your edit and hide edit warring, as you did here, is entirely inappropriate. Please never do this again. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 18:56, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Admin noticeboard

An editor has opened a thread about your editing at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Eva Golinger. Fences&Windows 20:17, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Username

A concern has been raised about you editing under the name "Eva Golinger". It may be your real name, but to avoid impersonation could you please send proof of your identity by email to Wikipedia's volunteer team at info-en@wikimedia.org? An alternative would be to change your username, you can do this at Wikipedia:Changing username. Fences&Windows 01:43, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Evagolinger1, it appears you really are not Eva Golinger.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

Please choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. However, do not create a new account if you wish to credit your existing contributions to a new name through a username change. To request a username change:

1. Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to edit this talk page even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
3. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a list of names that have already been taken. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Blueboy96 01:44, 7 March 2010 (UTC)