User talk:ExperiencePerception1

Welcome!

Hello, ExperiencePerception1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:ExperiencePerception1/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! GeneralNotability (talk) 04:11, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:ExperiencePerception1/sandbox

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:ExperiencePerception1/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GeneralNotability (talk) 04:11, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. GeneralNotability (talk) 04:11, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ExperiencePerception1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

ExperMate1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Not spam, real person testing features

Decline reason:

Your choice of new username seems to be acceptable. Regarding the block itself, you being a real person is not in doubt. You have violated WP:PROMO, WP:COI, and WP:PAID. Now that you know you will not be permitted to edit about your company, at least in the short term, please tell what topics you will edit about instead as a general contributor. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:53, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose of the page is to add a base reference for Perception the company, which is referenced in many Wikipedia articles. Why is this not permitted? How is the content supposed to get posted? 170.250.168.212 (talk) 02:23, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to talk about marvel movies, that I have spent time collecting info about but do not have any affiliation with ExperiencePerception1 (talk) 19:15, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ExperiencePerception1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to talk about marvel movies, that I have spent time collecting info about but do not have any affiliation with. I don't work fir the companies I'm trying to post about.

Decline reason:

It is simply not plausible that you have no affiliation with the companies you're trying to post about. For example, you personally created and own the copyright to File:Perception-logo-black.svg, according to your own statements, and have been trying to post about that company. Yamla (talk) 21:24, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ExperiencePerception1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

=the image was downloaded from the site as was all the information. You literally have absolutely no proof that I have any affiliation with the company. Someone can be a knowledgeable fan without trying to self-promote. how else if the information supposed to be shared? If I have information about marvel movies, some of which comes from perception, some comes from HBO, & I was to post about it, are you going to accuse me of being affiliated with marvel & trying to promote them? I want to add a reference for materials that do not exist to provide better wiki links for the community. Has nothing to do with the company.

Decline reason:

Your spam was written in first person. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:40, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You said the Perception Logo was your "own work". You said, "I, the copyright holder of this work". This is clearly visible at File:Perception-logo-black.svg. These are your claims. --Yamla (talk) 10:16, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You also talked about Perception in this manner: "We divide our time equally between the parallel worlds of science-fiction—working with trailblazing filmmakers, and science-fact—collaborating with the world’s most innovative technology brands." Given your claims, your words, and your username, nobody is going to believe your current claim that you have no conflict of interest. --Yamla (talk) 10:55, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That text is literally copied straight from their website. It's not something I made up! That's where The info is from. I was going to change it & provide the citation but was blocked before I even got to publish a page. When did I claim copyright holder of the logo? That's also available if you download it from their site. The same as if I go to marvel.com & their about page says "we focus on animation..." & there's a logo to copy named "marvel-logo.svg". Seems like you're just being difficult on purpose. ExperiencePerception1 (talk) 06:50, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's not any better. Admitting you violated WP:COPYRIGHT means you placed the entire Wikipedia project in jeopardy. As to where you made those claims about the logo, I've already indicated. File:Perception-logo-black.svg. --Yamla (talk) 11:33, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rename deferred

Awaiting unblock discussion -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:28, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Plot holes -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:29, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]