User talk:Eyesbro

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hi Eyesbro! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 21:19, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Huebl moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Thomas Huebl, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Fiddle Faddle 07:14, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Thomas Huebl has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Thomas Huebl. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 07:15, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Thomas Huebl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

*Thomas Huebl (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Spiritual teacher of marginal notability with conflict of interest issues. This article has been moved by its creator, User:Eyesbro, from draft space to article space three times, and has been moved back to draft space by two reviewers, User:TimTrent and User:CambridgeBayWeather. Each time, the article has been moved to draft space by the author, not reviewed. Moving the article to draft space a third time would be slow-motion move-warring.

Does User:Eyesbro have any connection with Thomas Huebl?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:48, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been move because the concern was lack of independent sources. Sources have since been added from major news publications and edu sources. Thus their concerns were addressed. Your comment points to not one issue that would justify the article not being published. There is no connection to the subject. I find his work inspiring and deserving of a page. Eyesbro (talk) 17:26, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thomas Huebl for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Huebl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Huebl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:14, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]