User talk:Ezhil OV

April 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hero – Gayab Mode On have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hero – Gayab Mode On was changed by Ezhil OV (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.948205 on 2021-04-15T07:07:22+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:07, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ezhil OV! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. —J. M. (talk) 16:29, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Siddharth Nigam seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 17:15, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm J. M.. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Siddharth Nigam in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.—J. M. (talk) 13:26, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Siddharth Nigam, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 13:27, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Siddharth Nigam, you may be blocked from editing. —J. M. (talk) 14:52, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Slow edit war on Siddharth Nigam[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:14, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm ManaliJain. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Siddharth Nigam have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ManaliJain (talk) 17:12, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]