User talk:Fact-writer-a

This is Fact-writer-a's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack McCullough (author) (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack McCullough (author) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 22:38, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fact-writer-a! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 22:38, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack McCullough (author) (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack McCullough (author) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 16:00, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jack McCullough (author) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jack McCullough (author), is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:17, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daphne Jones

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thelittlegreenfrog (talk) 03:48, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello Fact-writer-a. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Fact-writer-a. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Fact-writer-a|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. SmartSE (talk) 21:27, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SmartSE.

Thank you for your message.

I confirm my full compliance with the Wikipedia Terms of Use and policies.

I'm not being directly paid or indirectly compensated for my edits. Fact-writer-a (talk) 10:07, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jack McCullough (author) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jack McCullough (author). Thanks! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 15:59, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ingenuity.

Thank you for your comment.

McCullough’s best notability highlights include the following:

- He was MIT alum of the year and featured in an article by the publication:

https://alum.mit.edu/volunteer/recognition-and-awards/annual-awards/2018-award-winners

- During the biggest news story of 2023, he was a go-to-source for many media, including WSJ and Barron’s:

https://www.barrons.com/articles/companies-cash-big-banks-businesses-a61171b8

https://www.wsj.com/articles/many-startups-operate-without-a-cfo-that-was-a-challenge-as-svb-collapsed-2bf63fa9

- He is a frequent media source in general, as evidenced by the articles below and the overwhelming series of footnotes.

https://www.cfobrew.com/stories/2023/02/10/everybody-knows-jack

https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-CFOB-11297

https://www.wsj.com/articles/ges-larry-culp-signals-he-will-play-a-key-role-in-finding-new-cfo-11564599545

https://www.cfo.com/human-capital/2018/01/10-habits-of-highly-effective-cfos-work-life-balance/

https://www.cfodive.com/news/svb-could-be-biggest-story-for-cfos-since-covid-19/644874/

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6281683079001

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackmccullough/?sh=2d305f34276b

https://exec.mit.edu/s/blog-post/jack-mccullough-is-helping-cfos-rise-to-the-occasion-MCGVOKTD77UNHH5EXEKYHJOLIQZ4

- He consistently ranks among the top ChatGPT results when searching for "name some experts on the topic of CFOs."

Fact-writer-a (talk) 21:50, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Daphne Jones moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Daphne Jones, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:12, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack McCullough (author) (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack McCullough (author) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 20:09, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jack McCullough (author) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack McCullough (author) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack McCullough (author) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jamiebuba (talk) 20:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daphne Jones (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Despite the frankly RIDICULOUS levels of refbombing, there isn't enough to establish notability per WP:GNG, with the sources consisting of interviews, passing or no mentions, primary sources, non-reliable sources, press releases, churnalism, and pieces authored by the subject. We need to see significant coverage of her in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources. And please dial down the adulation.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daphne Jones and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:52, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Daphne Jones

Hello, Fact-writer-a. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daphne Jones, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Daphne Jones

Hello, Fact-writer-a. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Daphne Jones".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:59, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]