User talk:Reinis
| This is Reinis's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: Index, 1 |
Would you look at the Reinis article? I think you might have some knowledge on the subject. =] Eleven even (talk) 22:53, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Doubt it… Reinistalk 23:56, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
List of Roman Catholic clergy charged with sex offenses
[edit]You may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Roman Catholic clergy charged with sex offenses. -- Alan Liefting- (talk) - 20:30, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Dispute resolution?
[edit]I just ran across this comment on Malljaja's talk page. Seriously? You seem to have been around long enough to be familiar with the community norms, so may I recommend a nice cup of tea. Then, if you would like, pursue the normal dispute resolution channels. Sorry to butt in on this that does not concern me, but there really are better ways. - Eldereft (cont.) 22:52, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Pope Palpatine
[edit]
I have nominated Pope Palpatine, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pope Palpatine. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Gavin (talk) 21:04, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Happy 10th
[edit]
HeyBzuk (contribs) has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy!
Conflict of interest - User Xday
[edit]Hi - I think you previously raised concerns about conflict of interest to user XDay about the edits they made to the Theodore Beale article here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Xday I'm assuming you guessed, or have evidence, that this is Beale himself as his blogging name is Vox Day.
This user is editing the page again, on 16 October. I am an only occasional editor and don't know the process for escalating such a concern further. If you do, would you mind helping out? 76.218.68.67 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:33, 19 October 2011 (UTC).
Pēteris Stučkag
[edit]Hi Reinis, I found a public domain photo of Pēteris Stučka and slapped on a deletion template on the non-free image File:Stuchka.png. Just a heads-up, cheers, jonkerz ♠talk 11:06, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Reinis. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Reinis. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of The Mind
[edit]Hello Reinis,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Mind for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Atsme Talk 📧 01:18, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Nacism
[edit]Hello, Reinis
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nacism for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Mccapra (talk) 17:58, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:University of Latvia emblem.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:University of Latvia emblem.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
"Unicorn Museum" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Unicorn Museum and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 17#Unicorn Museum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TNstingray (talk) 23:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)