User talk:Fateh1699

This is Fateh1699's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kartar Singh Dakha (September 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by WikiDan61 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources about Singh appear to be a single blogger's writings about Sikh literature, not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kartar Singh Dakha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kartar Singh Dakha, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:24, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fateh1699! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:24, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Kabir. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. regentspark (comment) 14:19, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Since all you're doing here is adding links to a blog, I'm afraid it looks like you're a candidate for WP:NOTHERE. Note that not here editors are usually indefinitely blocked. --regentspark (comment) 14:24, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Regent Spark,

              You have alleged that the links added to the Kabir page are:-

inappropriate, for ADVERTISING spamming Since all you're doing here is adding links to a blog.

These are my humble submissions:- The links have been added in a separate section at the bottom portion of the blog. The earlier text which is way off the mark and deliberately misleading, similar to other Sikhism-related pages, has not even been touched. All the documents of which links have been added are rare, out of print and copyright free. The advertising motive is abundantly clearly behind the references given in the earlier References section which is full of copyright works. Wonder if this can be called spamming! The links are being added to add value to the page and provide another perspective to the subject under consideration. There is neither the thirst for increasing the page ranking, as the documents have already been viewed and downloaded thousands of times from blogger.com, archive.org, scribd.com, etc nor any monetary angle involved. The current guidelines and policies being followed on wikipedia clearly violate the much publicised and marketed view that wikipedia is a free, open source platform which respects diversity of views.

Hi Fateh1699. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and any content added here has to conform to our policies. Unfortunately, blogs and primary texts don't have encyclopedic value. Rather, we rely of reliable secondary sources to provide reliable interpretations of primary texts. The Sikh Digital Library seems to a commendable and useful endeavor, but it is not appropriate for inclusion here. Best wishes. --regentspark (comment) 16:16, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kartar Singh Dakha concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kartar Singh Dakha, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kartar Singh Dakha

Hello, Fateh1699. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kartar Singh Dakha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 16:04, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]