User talk:Filipoet

September 2022

Hello, Filipoet. This is your user talk page; the purpose of this page is for notification and communication with other Wikipedia editors. It is not a workspace for articles in progress or self-promotion. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or create new articles. Thank you. Uhai (talk · contribs) 16:29, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok thanks so much! Filipoet (talk) 16:50, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sara Cahill Marron (September 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Storchy were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:Secondary sources needed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sara Cahill Marron and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Storchy (talk) 16:52, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Filipoet! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Storchy (talk) 16:52, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sara Cahill Marron

Hello, Filipoet. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sara Cahill Marron, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sara Cahill Marron

Hello, Filipoet. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sara Cahill Marron".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:54, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It has not been over six months; I made edits this morning prior to 16:52 UTC! Please see the time stamp on the above message by Torchy. Filipoet (talk) 16:56, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! my page was resubmitted for review but I am not seeing that it is under review status? I followed the directions above, requested it be undeleted, and resubmitted it. Filipoet (talk) 16:49, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can someone please clarify if my page is still under review or not? It's a bit unclear to me what the status is. Thanks! Filipoet (talk) 19:26, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sara Cahill Marron (June 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

How "selected" is this list of works? It's enormous! And no apparent secondary sources...?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sara Cahill Marron and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 04:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The selected works are where my poems have appeared over the years in various magazines, I can link each one if that is what you’re suggesting in regards to secondary sources. 69.124.156.122 (talk) 02:54, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sara Cahill Marron (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Can't see a single in-depth, reliable, independent source here? See WP:REFBOMB.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sara Cahill Marron and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:22, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, according to the article you cited, none of the cites in this article are: "Citations lacking significant coverage – Citations which briefly namecheck the fact that the subject exists, but are not actually about the subject to any non-trivial degree. Example: A source which quotes the subject giving a brief soundbite to a reporter in an article about something or someone else."

They are published works by various (dozens) of books and magazines.

Please clarify how that fails to meet the criteria/why this submission keeps getting rejected. Filipoet (talk) 15:27, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sara Cahill Marron (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MurielMary were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As per the previous three reviews: awards section has no references; draft does not seem to establish notability of the subject. Please remedy these issues before re-submitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sara Cahill Marron and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 12:44, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sara Cahill Marron has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sara Cahill Marron. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at Draft:Sara Cahill Marron. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 18:46, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sara Cahill Marron (January 14)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:27, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I'm trying to delete this draft, can you help? Filipoet (talk) 15:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sara Cahill Marron

Hello, Filipoet. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Sara Cahill Marron".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:54, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]