User talk:Fixerupper75
Fixerupper75, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Fixerupper75! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 13 September 2020 (UTC) |
Courtesy notice: a conflict of interest discussion involving you
[edit]Greetings! This is to make you aware that you were mentioned by another user at WP:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Faculty (company). —C.Fred (talk) 18:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- I also strongly suggest that you re-engage in discussion at the talk page. A number of editors have raised concerns that your edits are not in compliance with Wikipedia policy about reliable sourcing. Please participate there in discussion about the merits of the edits, not about who proposed them. —C.Fred (talk) 17:38, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Dear C.Fred, I have engaged with the discussion about the merits of the edits, and believe that the article has become much more reliably sourced as a consequence. In this case, I must bring to your attention that there also appears to be a significant COI by an editor working on the page on behalf of a company's PR agent. Please see the talk page at Faculty (company) for further details. Fixerupper75 (talk) 20:45, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- An independent editor can agree with edits proposed by an editor with a conflict of interest without automatically having a conflict of interest. —C.Fred (talk) 00:33, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
September 2020
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at Talk:Faculty (company), you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia.This relates to your making accusations of CoI with no evidence. See also my very recent comment on this point on the article's talk page Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:50, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Dear Pigsonthewing, As per my response at the talk page, the COI by SmartSE is demonstratable. They received a message from Faculty's PR agent on their talk page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Smartse#Faculty_(company) - which precipitated all of their edits on this page. SmartSE did not then comply with WP:COI. In particular, SmartSE violated WP:COIRESPONSE by not complying with WP:WEIGHT, by ghostwriting on the PR agent's behalf, by deleting reliable sources, and by including self-published sources - all of which can be verified via their edit history. Furthermore, each of their edits have not complied with WP:COIATTRIBUTE - including their most recent edit today. I hope you are aware of this, before making such accusations. It seems that the only Wiki 'guideline' that you are following, Pigsonthewing, is WP:ABF. Fixerupper75 (talk) 20:42, 24 September 2020 (UTC)