User talk:Flakes41

Y'all can leave me a message anytime. Flakes41 (talk) 20:35, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Flakes41, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Opark 77 (talk) 09:27, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shame the Devil

Good job on starting the article and thanks for your note on my talk page. I've got some big exams coming up so I'm not editing much at the moment but I hope to work on The Wire articles a little more over the summer.--Opark 77 (talk) 09:27, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abusing multiple accounts. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

_GB^T/C 12:01, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Flakes41 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not been abusing multiple accounts. Why have I been blocked?

Decline reason:

You are believed to be editing on behalf of a blocked editor. — Yamla (talk) 15:37, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Flakes41 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have seriously no idea what you're talking about. I just moved to a new town and I know literally nobody. Please explain to me why you're blocking me more specifically.

Decline reason:

I find this edit where on your very first day of registering on Wikipedia you remove Creamy3's name from the members list of Wikipedia:WikiProject The Wire‎ 3 days after that account was indefinitely banned on Wikipedia to be quite suspicious. If you are indeed new to Wikipedia and not related at all to Creamy3, then please by all means provide a good explanation. -- Netsnipe ► 16:25, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Requested the blocking admin to review the case. Stifle (talk) 15:52, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message - I've reviewed my original decision, and stand by it. Reasons include :

His names fits the profile for Creamy3 sock/meatpuppets - although I accept that in and of itself this isn't exactly a smoking gun.
He voted in support of Creamy3 here, four days after Creamy3 was indef blocked, and ignoring a message to that effect a couple of lines up.
Here he added himself to the list whilst removing Creamy3 at the same time.
He didn't mind when another editor vandalised his userpage.
He shows up adding himself to this page, as had Creamy3 and Creamy4 before him.
Ditto - the only other editor he's ever left a message for is here, where Creamy3 features heavily in the recent history.

Too much, in too few contributions, to be a coincidence, in my view. The unblock request isn't particularly plausible, but is precisely the sort of unblock request I'd expect a sock to come up with...anyway, I'm happy for you to have a look and draw your own conclusions. _{The public face of GB}^T/C 16:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Flakes41 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I looked at this creamy 3 person's page because I noticed that he was from the same city as me. I looked at his hurtful contributions to Wikipedia and thought that he was nothing more than a juvenile goofball. I decided that he deserved to be deleted from WikiProject The Wire because he was not a real contributor. Now I get why you think I'm him. Thanks

Decline reason:

Just another creamy meat- or sockpuppet. Stop wasting our time. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 18:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

And yet you still voted for this "juvenile goofball" to become a WikiProject coordinator. Nice contradiction you have there. Want to try explaining that as well? -- Netsnipe ► 18:07, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Flakes41 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I honestly have no idea what you're talking about. I am not a creamy meat puppet or whatever you said. Please don't block me.

Decline reason:

Abuse of the unblock tag, page protected. — Sandstein (talk) 20:07, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.