User talk:Flavio.brandani/Archivio 1

Your recent edit to Western Black Rhinoceros (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 13:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC) flavio/Tigre reietta 18:00, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mohrg image

Probably not, it's not really allowed to just add images to D&D pages under fair use. The reason is that one of the requirements to meet fair use is that it must not harm the copyright holder financially. If we add images to our pages, we're getting to close to making the source books unnecessary. That's why I put an image URL link in the infobox instead of a spot for an actual image. There are ways around this rule, but it's going to be hard for a less common monster like a Mohrg. If you can find a Mohrg on the cover of a book, or in a screenshot from a video game, you can add the image as long as you discuss the Mohrg's appearance on the cover of the book or in the video game. Basically for D&D monsters, any image has to be accompanied by "significant" (I would say 4+ sentences) discussion. The image at Beholder#Beholders in other media is a pretty good example of this. The image link in the infobox is the best we can do for a lot of creatures. - Peregrine Fisher 18:13, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Allip

Regarding your edits to Allip, what on Earth does 'neutraly weaked' mean? I am unfamiliar with editions before third beyond casually PCing for a short time, but, even if it is an early edition, I think it is spelt wrong. J Milburn 18:31, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what you are talking about, sorry. Is there some kind of translation issue? I dunno... Neutral Evil is right though, that is what it should say in the infobox. J Milburn 20:47, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

some pointers

The first image of an animal on an article should go into the taxobox. The range map also goes into the taxobox. See Margay. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your presumption that I'm female is incorrect. The image was inappropriate as it was a gaming card, not an image of a King Cheetah. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If the image is already on Commons, you do not need to re-upload it. Just put it on the article as you would any other. Wiki is smart enough to find images on the local language and on Commons. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:37, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, I'm a guy. I'm male. A man. If you have image on the it: Wiki, then upload them to commons so all of the different language Wikis can use them. And you don't have to make a new section for each reply. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The range map you are using for Wildcat does not match the description of the range. I've reverted it off. Again. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is NOT the range of the SPECIES. It is the range of one of the SUBSPECIES. - UtherSRG (talk) 04:05, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We have different standards fo en: Wiki. Just because your wiki says someting, doesn't mean that en: wiki will say the same thing. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do not speak Italian. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:36, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, NO. It is not appropriate to use a game image on a scientific article. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:14, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. That image is in a foreign language. If you want it to be used, supply one with a legend in English. - UtherSRG (talk) 20:32, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You do not seem to know what vandalism is. Please cite your references on why you think the species is "extinct in the wild" (note the spelling) and not totally "extinct". - UtherSRG (talk) 12:58, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not going to chase down the reference on another wiki. It is your job as editor to include the reference when you make your edits here on en. I don't speak any language other than English. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:11, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License claims

Please don't make edits like this without being able to demonstrate the validity of such a license claim. We cannot claim something is licensed under the GFDL when the author is "unknown". Jkelly 19:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marine Otter

Thanks for your interest in the article. Photographs and maps are needed, but you have uploaded photo and maps for Sea Otters, which are a different species, found in a different hemisphere, than Marine Otters. Marine Otters are from South America. Unfortunately, good photographs and even scientific data on them are sparse. If you find any good ones, please include them. 206.13.43.131 18:55, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wolf distribution

Hello, in reply to your message-

"Hi dear Tommyknocker...! You are very good to create maps... alas if we on it.wiki have a user as you:-):-):-) Hear draling... why should you destroy the wolf subspecies map?

1)Wolf are present in Scotland because they are reintroduced them

2)Wolf are stil present in Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan..I see it..

3)Wolf are stil present in Austria, Denmark and Moldova...

answer to me Flavio/Tigre Reietta 14:06, 7 March 2007 (UTC)"

I didn't 'destroy' the wolf subspecies map, though I did remove it from wikipedia. I feel that it's not accurate enough for an encyclopedia, and without years of research in the field, it would not be possible to accurately represent the location of the different wolf subspecies. It's not definate how many subspecies there are, or if indeed some (such as the Eastern Canadian) might even be separate species. So creating maps for them now seems a bit futile of me.

1) They aren't, but might be in the future. However Scottish National Heritage are still being stubborn bastards over the issue, so I wouldn't be too hopeful.

2) Certainly a possibility, though I'm afraid I'll have to ask for a recent and reliable source before I change the maps. If I had a penny for every time someone misidentifies a dog/coyote/african hunting dog (yes, really)...

3) I'm almost positive they've been extirpated in Denmark. Austria and Moldova I wouldn't completely rule out though, but again, I need some sources.

Thankyou for your feedback. --Tommyknocker 23:13, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Img

On english wikipedia that image is considered fair use and could be uploaded ...but it's not the same thing on it.wp (fair-use is illegal).--Nick1915 18:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not "caro"... I'm cheap--Nick1915 20:11, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mon-ati!--Nick1915 13:19, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Chinchilla

While I understand that you were trying to improve the chinchilla article, your edits were not helpful and were reverted by myself. They messed the formatting up, causing several breaks in the page and an overall unprofessional look to it. Please utilize the sandbox that Wikipedia offers to test your edits before putting them into the actual article to make sure they will come out looking right. Thank you. --pIrish 13:41, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately no, I do not speak Italian. If you want, I can try to get the pictures in the article in a way that won't mess with the formatting if you'd like. I won't be able to do it until later, but I would be willing to help you out if you want. --pIrish 14:11, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the picture into the chinchilla article. Let me know what you think! --pIrish 16:35, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'm glad you like it! :-) My real name is Stephanie, but I go by pIrish all over the internet. --pIrish 21:29, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lion subspecies

In this edit you added P. l. goojratensis and several invalid "subspecies" to the lion subspecies. What are your sources for that? Where was the range of this "subspecies"? The indian subspecies (in Gir as well as in captivity) is called P. l. persica and the link of goojratensis leads to this subspecies. The status of the Marozi is doubtful and by far not clear. Even in the article it is claimed to be a hybrid. Moreover its already mentioned in an extra part under the subspecies. After "A. Turner: The big cats and their fossil relatives. Columbia University Press, 1997.ISBN 0-231-10229-1" P. toscana is not a lion subspecies. About P (l.) youngi I am not shure, but I will try to find good sources. You said my edit was vandalism, but you added wrong information which is not confirmed by sources. I would rather call this vandalism.--Altaileopard 10:05, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jacques Chirac

"Jacques René Chirac" is his official name. Not Reneé. See fr wiki. cheers --Edcolins 20:45, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Caspian tiger

Hello, its me again. You called my revert cruel vandalism do you have a proper reference for this edit ?Otherwise I will revert it again.Greetings--Altaileopard 16:52, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Micio.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Micio.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Pharos 09:53, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to explain the problem. If a blog has a photograph and does not name the photographer, we assume it was probably copied from somewhere else. In this case, we can see the same picture in a BBC article, credited to the World Wildlife Fund ("WWF").

You are also in error about blogeko's license. Their license is non-commercial (BY-NC-SA) — NC means "non-commercial", and Wikipedia only accepts licenses that allow for commercial re-use. Thank you.--Pharos 19:51, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Workimagethumb49.png

An image that you uploaded, Image:Workimagethumb49.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 163.139.215.193 14:49, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop uploading images

It appears you've been uploading a lot of images with questionable copyright status recently. I'm going to have to ask you to please stop now. so I can review these images. Particularly, it appears that the fishbase images all violate copyright--Pharos 19:18, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

Ciao Flavio! Non far casini con le immagini! ;-) Riguardo alle sottospecie di leopardo, l'articolo linkato dice che "è probabile che in futuro saranno ridotte a 8".... quindi per il momento conviene tenere anche le altre, almeno finché non arriva uno specialista di leopardi che ci chiarisce come stanno davvero le cose! Ciao --Al Pereira (talk) 13:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Tn_Alfal_u0.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Tn_Alfal_u0.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:31, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Tn_Alfal_u0.gif

An image that you uploaded, Image:Tn_Alfal_u0.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 163.139.215.193 15:20, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:00561.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:00561.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leopardus species

Read this: talk:Leopardus. Things have changed. My edits were not "cruel vandalism", but rather they are updating the articles to more recent information. If you continue to make personal attacks on my edits, I will have to block you. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:49, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]