User talk:Foalselec

April 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Women in Kuwait has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Women in Kuwait was changed by Foalselec (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958539 on 2015-04-30T18:45:24+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:45, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Foalselec, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Foalselec! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:31, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Women in Kuwait, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 05:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Women in Kuwait. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 05:47, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain to me what is "unconstructive" in my edits? I looked at my edits and I find them very constructive. Why are they "unconstructive", exactly???

Can you explain to me what is "disruptive" in my edits? I looked at my edits and I find them very constructive. Why are they "disruptive", exactly???

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Women in Kuwait, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop removing content and edit warring. Most of your content removals are unexplained and do not correspond to sourcing. Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 06:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]