User talk:Foil7

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Foil7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Jianqing Emperor, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Fram (talk) 09:25, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jianqing Emperor[edit]

The article Jianqing Emperor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Probble hoax or mistake, no evidence that there ever was a Khan called Jianqing. The date 1796 matches exactly the Chinese emperor Jiaqing, so this is a typo or alternative transliteration of that one, but the wasn't Khan of Mongolia. Failed to find any reliable source to support this article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:25, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Imperial Noble Consort Shujia[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Imperial Noble Consort Shujia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. --Forward Unto Dawn 12:12, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because of Anya[edit]

Thank you for your contribution. There are however two problems:

You don't explain why is the novel notable.
You don't quote any sources.

If you don't develop the page, it may be deleted.Xx236 (talk) 10:27, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Social Outcasts. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CrashUnderride 01:40, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]