User talk:FranzHansEugene

Welcome!

Hi FranzHansEugene! I noticed your contributions to Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! HopsonRoad (talk) 18:14, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy

Hi FranzHansEugene, I notice that we are reverting each other's contributions. I invite you to review Wikipedia:Reverting.

I explained my reversion of your original contribution, as follows: "Remove good-faith, uncited contribution. "Worked with" and "long walks" doesn't tell the reader of this article much. Please provide more substance, supported by a reference." Let's discuss at Talk:Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy#Ehrenberg and Rosenzweig?. Cheers, HopsonRoad (talk) 01:10, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Ehr1Ros2 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ehr1Ros2. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:35, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing illegitimate or scandalous in my writings on Hans Ehrenberg and Franz Rosenzweig. Have you attended the conferences of the International Council of Christians and Jews, Hans Ehrenberg Society, Franz Rosenzweig Society, lately? Ar you on speaking terms with the Vatican?FranzHansEugene (talk) 02:19, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FranzHansEugene (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Nothing illegitimate or scandalous in my writings on Hans Ehrenberg and Franz Rosenzweig. Have you attended the conferences of the International Council of Christians and Jews, Hans Ehrenberg Society, Franz Rosenzweig Society, lately? Are you on speaking terms with the Vatican? It would seem that several Wikipedia pages are needed to cover all the Peace Conferences of the 20th century. I remain doubtful of the credibility of Wikipedia. FranzHansEugene (talk) 02:29, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

None of this is relevant to your block. Please reread WP:GAB. Yamla (talk) 10:24, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{unblock|reason=Is the History of Peace unsuitable for Wikipedia? Why is that? FranzHansEugene (talk) 10:57, 10 February 2022 (UTC)}[reply]

This is not relevant to your block. As you are clearly deliberately wasting our time here, too, and as you have lost access to your talk page over on your original account, I will upgrade the block here to match that. --Yamla (talk) 11:26, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]