|This is FutureTrillionaire's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to FutureTrillionaire.|
|Archives: 1, 2, 3|
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
|... you were recipient
no. 703 of Precious,
a prize of QAI!
Hi you have made certain edits in China article regarding its religion. Please don't forget to put religious stats in the infobox and it must be in sync with the pie chart. Make necessary changes which are required in the "religious section" of the China article.--Anandmoorti (talk) 17:42, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Reference errors on 18 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Controversy on the "New Age" article, can you pitch in?
Dear FutureTrillionaire, - Back in 23 - 28 June 2013, I worked with you on the GAR of the popular New Age article, and the GA status was eventually maintained. Since then, the article has been expanded by well over 50%, largely by the talented Midnughtblueowl; and some of his/her strategies and reversions have struck me as wrongheaded. As a result, I have just posted a "Four items that need to be resolved ASAP" statement at the bottom of the article's Talk page, Talk:New Age. Two senior Wikipedia editors have already responded to it, including Midnightblueowl, and I wonder if you could ignore your college studies for a moment (not a great idea, I know) and pitch in before rapid consensus is reached.
Please do not misunderstand: I am not asking you to take "my side" on these items. I simply know that at one time you had become very familiar with the article, and that you handled the GAR very well. Also, I believe both of the major responders so far are not from North America, and I would really like a North American senior Wikipedia editor to assess the use-value of the "Movement" sub-section of the Definitions section (issue #2 in the "Four items" statement). Best, - Babel41 (talk) 00:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)