User talk:GMBWalker

Image source problem with File:RaqqaWareLusterBowl.jpeg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:RaqqaWareLusterBowl.jpeg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:03, 29 November 2018 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 18:03, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Note: This image is from the Met, and all of their images are under the public domain. Please see these links. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ and https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/444484?pos=2

Image source problem with File:RaqqaWareCeramicLantern.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:RaqqaWareCeramicLantern.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:03, 29 November 2018 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 18:03, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Replaced images, copyright problems still unresolved

Um, you have been given very detailed warnings and explanations above about copyright, but you have replaced the images without taking any of the lessons to heart. You had better read the stuff above, very quickly, and add appropriate tags to your images. Since the makers died many centuries ago, you can add {{PD-old-100}} to say "public domain, owners died over 100 years ago" to the various images on Commons. If not they'll be deleted, again, and you will likely be blocked from Wikipedia for ignoring copyright warnings. Your choice. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:30, 12 December 2018 (UTC)