User talk:GabeGarrett1986!

Welcome!

Hello, GabeGarrett1986!!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 13:45, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

McGaffey, New Mexico

added a link pointing to 2020 census

Reedsport, Oregon

added a link pointing to Roseburg

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chandler, Colorado

With this edit at Chandler, Colorado, you added 2010 US census data. What was you source to support this addition? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Summerville, Oregon, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Skelton, Indiana, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop your disruptive editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jarvis Island, you may be blocked from editing. Unnecessary to add the year for population of uninhabited island. If it were added the "population_as_of" value would be used in the infobox. Outlying Minor Islands were last included in the 2000 Census, so a reliable source would be needed. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 16:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Gleeson, Arizona. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:50, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:24, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Hammersoft (talk) 01:55, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This new block is for a week. Despite being blocked, you returned to the same disruptive behavior for which you were blocked before. If after this new block expires, you once again return to the same behavior, the next block will be considerably longer, and possibly indefinite. STOP what you are doing. Continuing to make unsourced edits is NOT your way forward. This ends now. --Hammersoft (talk) 01:55, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hammersoft: This editor is now using their IP to edit. See [1]. Similar edits were made today as well. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It might or might not be. The Lost Cove edit happened before the two blocks on this account. There's no cast iron proof the IP continues to edit while this block is in place. Possible, yes. Certain, no. Gabe, if this is you (and I'm not asking you to confirm it is), be aware that block evasion will result in a longer block. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:20, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Hammersoft (talk) 01:55, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked twice previously for conducting edits without a source. You've been warned repeatedly. Despite this, you continue to make unsourced edits as you did here. This behavior is absolutely not acceptable on this project. If you decide to create a new account, it will be discovered as a block evading sockpuppet and it too will be indefinitely blocked. This ends. Now. Goodbye. --Hammersoft (talk) 00:11, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]