User talk:Gaggi96

Welcome!

Hello, Gaggi96, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 04:55, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Translated article

Hi, thanks for your work, but in future please ask for assistance when dumping translated articles on en.WP. This one should not have wasted so much of our time in removing senseless links (see Wp:OVERLINK) and addressed other issues. Tony (talk) 03:01, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review. So you are basically saying this article is poorly written, only because of overlinking?--Gaggi96 (talk) 18:58, 8 October 2016 (UTC) I think this article is not great but average, to be honest.--Gaggi96 (talk) 21:12, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Both. The deficit is large. 00:46, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

I already knew about the lack of text in this article. It is pretty hard to make it as massive as the other major articles about football stadiums because I can't find more sources about Laugardalsvöllur. The intention was, however, to build up later. But I really want to finish the "Facilities" section. What do you think of the text I have already written there?--Gaggi96 (talk) 02:36, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

— Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 13:28, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023–2024 Sundhnúkur eruptions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drone. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:27, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sulphur dioxide

Good work on 2023–2024 Sundhnúkur eruptions. Perhaps you could consider reverting the above two changes as it is now official in British English in chemical context to use term Sulfur. Hate it myself as a chemist trained outside USA and I agree the context may be common term rather than chemistry so have not acted myself. ChaseKiwi (talk) 07:54, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I have changed it. Gaggi96 (talk) 22:11, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article Size

Another suggestion given recent very interesting to read improvements to 2023–2024 Sundhnúkur eruptions. The article is hitting WP:AS and many suspect a new eruption will be needing article space within a few days. There are still 6 months to go in 2024. The entire etymology section should probably be moved to Sundhnúkur and Sundhnúksgígar articles. I think the later was created in irritation by others after the eruption stated and indeed much of my work behind the scenes in Iceland articles in last year was motivated when I found poor use of the name Reykjanes or rigor as you apply. The main problem with moving content is acknowledgement, so if you move your own recent contributions if you think appropriate noting why in the articles talk I would then contribute to consensus discussion there as we will face this issue sometime. (I am still involved in article clean up after geological events on rest of planet but ultimately other editors with better English language skills than mine should do most of the heavy lifting to get high gradings as I have never managed more than a B grading by myself on articles I have become interested in. ) ChaseKiwi (talk) 07:51, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the suggestion. Maybe I can start moving the text as soon as a new eruption starts? Gaggi96 (talk) 15:19, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]