User talk:Gandalfthegay2022

March 2024[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Frodo Baggins have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Frodo Baggins was changed by Gandalfthegay2022 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2024-03-31T02:26:25+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aragorn. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Aragorn was changed by Gandalfthegay2022 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.931563 on 2024-03-31T02:27:04+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:27, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:33, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gandalfthegay2022 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All of you have failed. Especially User:Thebirdlover. Your sockpuppet investigation has been closed and dismissed. You admitted yourselves in the comments of the investigation that there is no block that can completely stop me. You have failed. I will continue to vandalize the Lord of The Rings articles. Since User:Thebirdlover helped investigate me I will consistently vandalize their talk page and revert their edits. I will create endless socks from tons of different pubic (ha ha) wifi networks. I am completely unstoppable. I will see you all tomorrow bright and early for another hillariously fun day of vandalism. HAAAAAAA HAAAAAA HAAAA thats what she said. Gandalfthegay2022 (talk) 00:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:10, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gandalfthegay2022 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Scratch the second part, I will not vandalize the bird lover's talk page. I have no beef with them. From the bottom of my heart I truly hope that you have a wonderful day. Gandalfthegay2022 (talk) 00:07, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am glad you will not, I have no beef with you either, in fact I find you a funny and clever person despite not understanding the point of this or thinking it’s appropriate for Wikipedia. Sometimes I wonder why some of the more creative vandals like you don’t publish books or write essays or something. I would legit read it. Maybe do that instead of vandalizing. --Thebirdlover (talk) 00:19, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Ad Orientem (talk) 01:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]