User talk:Gentilal

Welcome

Reason for deletion

There was a further discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boubaker polynomials (3rd nomination) that resulted in the article's deletion. MBisanz ^talk 21:40, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I disagree, I believed and still believe the consensus was to delete. You may appeal it at WP:Requests for undeletion. MBisanz ^talk 20:49, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[1]

Steps to list a new deletion review

Before listing a review request, please attempt to discuss the matter with the admin who deleted the page (or otherwise made the decision) as this could resolve the matter faster. There could have been a mistake, miscommunication, or misunderstanding, and a full review may not be needed. Such discussion also gives the admin the opportunity to clarify the reasoning behind a decision. If things don't work out, please note in the DRV listing that you first tried discussing the matter with the admin who deleted the page.

Blocked

Actually, checkuser just confirmed to me you are a ban evading sock, so you have been blocked. MBisanz ^talk 08:32, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gentilal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Am I blocked because my IP is issued from an ARAB country??? or because I embarrassed an injust administrator?? I am not a multiple account user but a fan of the polynomials, is that enough for a blocking??????

Decline reason:

No, you're an abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 16:16, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gentilal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That is amazing, MBisanz is sending email to me then he is accusing me being a ban evading sock?!, and I have to prove the opposite !! at least I must be either informed by what I did wrong or unblocked;

Decline reason:

No, checkuser has already confirmed that you are using this account to avoid a block on another account; you don't need to try to prove anything. Instead, you should log out, turn off the computer, and read a good book or take a nice walk in the sunshine; there are many good hobbies in the world other than Wikipedia for you to enjoy. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gentilal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my single account, with a registered email address, Wikipedia is a respectful institution; a respectful answer is expected from its administrators; they can make mistakes , none is perfect! please unblock.

Decline reason:

No, checkuser isn't perfect, but it's very very very very good at finding sockpuppets. A "confirmed" result means there is practically no way you aren't the same person. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 00:51, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gentilal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am the same person as WHO?????????????????????? ; I have got my personal IP, my personal emailing address, So for justice and fair, either tell me which person I 'am' according to the checkuser or unblock, Thanks

Decline reason:

The gods have spoken. BJ^Talk 01:11, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.