User talk:George.boeck

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hanns Diehl (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hanns Diehl and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 20:22, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hanns Diehl has been accepted

Hanns Diehl, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:00, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

	Merry Christmas!!
	May you and your family have a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, Thanks for all your help and support, and of course all your work, on Wikipedia! – Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:50, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, George.boeck. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

copyright

So I took at look at Draft:Anna Spitzmüller and noticed you copied 95% of it from this blog entry. I'm guessing the blog entry is yours because you specifically say you're going to take it to Wikipedia but here's the problem: Wikipedia assumes every other source asserts copyright unless they SPECIFICALLY identify their content as public domain/ creative commons or we can determine such. Right now, I could say that you stole content from another source (without even attributing it) and I could request that draft be deleted per WP:COPYVIO. What you need to do is mark your blog (if it is yours) as public domain (or at least CC-BY-SA). That, or you need to entirely re-write your draft. We get this problem from time to time when someone develops text in a blog and then decides to write a Wikipedia entry not realizing they're not allowed to steal their own words. Please fix. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:04, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My helpful Chris:

I'm working on putting a note on the wordpress blog saying it is CC-BY-SA, whatever that means. Sadly, I have no idea how to respond to your thoughtful note. Your talk site asks me to do it from this note. Maybe this will work. The exact text is from a * footnote and says: *This post was written by Erika Esau who states that it is CC-BY-SA, a form of open source, free-use, copyright waived bit of intellectual property.

I went on to denigrate the Wikipedia editors who are trying to frustrate the effort to post this stalwart woman's bio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by George.boeck (talk • contribs) 00:10, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It would appear Megalibrarygirl published your draft into mainspace without looking at the COPYVIO report but your note removes any legal stumbling blocks. It's a decent article. Thanks for your patience with this. Wikipedia as an organization was formed by the "big fish in small ponds" and to that end, might not be what many outside writers might expect or agree with. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:10, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Chris troutman for making sure everything is in compliance! :) Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:19, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, George.boeck. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, George.boeck. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Annie Harmon in her studio ca 1887.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Annie Harmon in her studio ca 1887.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]