User talk:GMCmcrow

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Germcrow! Thank you for your contributions. I am Anupam and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Anupam^Talk 01:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Thanks for adding those categories on Internet censorship and surveillance in Africa. Sincerely, Masum Reza^☎ 17:39, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CSD tags

Hi, I've just declined three WP:A7 tags of yours because they do not meet the criteria. Please see Wikipedia:Common claims of significance or importance, specifically "Article contains an assertion of coverage of any kind in at least one independent reliable source" which all of these articles did. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:58, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t create the page on Nigel Geunole

So I’m not sure why you left me a message that says in part, I did create it. MensanDeltiologist (talk) 20:59, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:MensanDeltiologist, That's an automatic message from TW. Maybe you curated the page on sth. It's nothing to worry about though. ~GMCmc ^{{talk to me}} 21:10, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I know. But the person that seems to have created the article got no such message. MensanDeltiologist (talk) 23:36, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

thanks for contributing to wiki, I came across an article you created/contributed Gays Against Guns. Nice efforts, Please add some more references from research articles/books/prominent newspapers which are reviewing the subject of this article in details. thanks

QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 12:59, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of HeartSpeak

The article HeartSpeak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I am unable to find significant discussion of the subject in reliable sources. Results are all blogs and podcasts, but nothing in mainstream news or scientific journals.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 17:27, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of HeartSpeak

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on HeartSpeak, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 09:21, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of HeartSpeak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HeartSpeak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HeartSpeak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guliolopez (talk) 02:22, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 10:55, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of EZOfficeinventory

The article EZOfficeinventory has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No WP:SIGCOV. Created by indef-blocked paid spammer

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 14:20, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]