User talk:Gigiandd

This is Gigiandd's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donald Lewis Sparks (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Donald Lewis Sparks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Donald Lewis Sparks, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 19:10, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gigiandd! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 19:10, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Draft:Donald Lewis Sparks, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 13:41, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Donald Lewis Sparks has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission:

Since this is your only contribution, and since it is written in exactly the format of a press release, it is reasonable to ask whether you are a connected contributor, in which case you must declare the connection. Please see our rules on Conflict of Interest If you are writing this for pay or as a staff member of the organization, see also WP:PAID for the necessary disclosures. Please reply here, and on the draft, and I shall review it. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 05:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much. As I am new to Wikipedia, I'm still trying to figure out navigating around and communicating. I am a connected contributor (?) or paid contributor (?) (unsure of terminology and the mechanics of how to disclose) , as I am employed by the same organization as my subject Donald Lewis Sparks. I would like to continue improving the article as well as other due diligence! Thanks for taking a look at the early draft. Gigiandd (talk) 19:14, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If any part of your job duties involves editing wp, or if the firm asked you to do it, you're paid, otherwise just connected. Just say which. The definition can be a little fuzzy, like most things here.

As for the article, An encyclopedia article is not a full CV, but neither is it just a directory entry. Make sure the article contains the full sequence of degrees and positions, with dates; a complete list of books published, if any, with year, date, publisher, ISBN (referenced to WorldCat), and links to published reviews of them; and, (in thesciences) the 5 most cited peer-reviewed articles, given in full with coauthors, full name of journals, and links, with the number of citations to each of them; include any national level awards--(not junior awards or awards from their own university) Add major outside positions, such as president of major national organizations, and any positions of editor-in-chief ; Membership or minor offices in most societies, and service on editorial boards, do not count for much & are better omitted. Internal college service doesn't count for an encyclopedia Very sparse articles attract skepticism. as do those using vague claims and superlatives, or those that list all possible internal and external committes. For all of these, give a source, but figure out how to listthem without copying or close paraphrase.

The orginal reviewer didn't seem to understand about the rules for professors, WP:PROF, but I will explain it to them . after the article gets fixed up and accepted.

Fellow AAAS is a very important honor, and should be highlighted by putting it in the lead. Pres. Soil Sci Society, ditto. Mentoring students is routine, unless any of them are notable enough to have WP articles here.

So add/remove the necesssary material, and let me know on my talk page. DGG ( talk ) 06:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Gigiandd! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Citing a website that contains a searchable database, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donald Lewis Sparks has been accepted

Donald Lewis Sparks, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 04:52, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Your edit to Donald Lewis Sparks has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]