User talk:GlaubePL

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello GlaubePL! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 19:51, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Massacres of Poles in Volhynia

Regarding killings in Prekhorile, Sakhryn, Pavlokoma, an article concerning Polish-Ukrainian conflict on the area of present-day Poland would be needed.

Maybe changing the title to "Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia" would clarify what the article is about - these are territories where, according to the sources, UPA's ethnic cleansing operation took place; the new title would match the lead and the sections. Hedviberit (talk) 09:20, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GlaubePL. You have new messages at Volunteer Marek's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Why are you knowingly using the higher bound numbers (and lower bound for Ukrainians) and the "including Vistula" line when you know we're active on the talk page about this? Why not leave it baseline until we get the chart and other facts straightened out, vs cherrypicking sources. I don't want to get into an edit war on this but come on, man.--Львівське (говорити) 19:13, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Motyka is only one source, and is not the be-all source on these matters. You are fully aware we are constructing a table of all of the sources out there to come up with a neutral assessment of the figures.--Львівське (говорити) 20:59, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That you're calling the sources you don't like "outdated and biased" (Magocsi's is from 2011) speaks to bad faith and POV pushing on your part. You can't cherry pick what sources you like to be in the article or dub one better than the other just because you like one more on a personal level.--Львівське (говорити) 21:33, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, late 2010. And my opinion on Himka is just an opinion, based on reading a lot of his stuff. He's not layed back and recounting history, but trying to prove a point. In one his smaller books I found him completely contradict himself....I digress...the point was just to be cautious with him, is all.

--Львівське (говорити) 21:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Volodymyr Viatrovych

Your edits to this article, whether factual or not, are written in gross violation of the basic rule of maintaining a neutral point of view. Please discuss this further at the BLP noticeboard. For the time being, please leave all that off the article. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 00:06, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Volodymyr Viatrovych, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:37, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Volodymyr Viatrovych‎

That is much, much better. Thank you for listening to our concerns about NPOV, and for taking the time to rework the material. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:36, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]