User talk:GloBallista

February 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Determinism, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:02, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to Cyber (Marvel Comics), even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:10, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Phenomenology (sociology). It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:18, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kensi Blye. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:21, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:39, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure whether this is some sort of AI experiment gone wrong, or you're trying to burn through extended confirmed so quickly that you're edits have become indistinguishable from vandalism, but it's completely disruptive.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:39, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ponyo Yeah, I wasn't sure, it was very confusing. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:43, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ponyo sorry! made an unblock request and explained what happened below. GloBallista (talk) 16:03, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GloBallista (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry for making bad edits. I used an addon to fix grammar errors and it got crazy and I didn't notice how I made all those mistakes. I deleted it already and won't make it again. Sorry and thanks for your patience and guidance. GloBallista (talk) 16:02, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't believe an addon made this and this edit. What kind of addon would introduce "bwiththe" or "beiwhoqisiet, s andnsitive bo"? You are welcome to make a new unblock request, but you'll need to be specific about the addon you were using. We'll need to verify your claim that this add-on would generate that sort of output. Yamla (talk) 16:28, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.