User talk:Gnana Sreekar

August 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Custom ROM has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Custom ROM was changed by Gnana Sreekar (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.915228 on 2017-08-30T07:05:28+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:05, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bloatwear

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Bloatwear, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Nihal Thalassery (talk) 07:08, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Samsung Galaxy S4. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Samsung Galaxy S4 was changed by Gnana Sreekar (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851099 on 2017-09-01T04:58:52+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:58, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Darius robin (talk) 10:08, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ROM flashing

A tag has been placed on ROM flashing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

The subject has no significance to have an article. The article is heavily unreferenced, and the sources mentioned don't meet WP:RS. Also the nothing can be found from the searches to establish subject's notability.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:48, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ROM flashing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ROM flashing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ROM flashing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:09, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Providing anchor reference at Mercury article

Hello, I see you've added short footnote citations of the Tills book at the Mercury article. You'll still need to provide an anchor reference, with ref=harv parameter, in the refs= parameter of the reflist template near the bottom of the article. Dhtwiki (talk) 21:48, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]