User talk:Godmadeit

January 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Colusa, California, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Colusa, California was changed by Godmadeit (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870647 on 2012-01-11T05:10:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:10, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Arcata, California

Greetings. I reverted your edits today on Arcata, California, Hyampom, California & Hayfork, California because the terms "homosexual household" and "heterosexual household" are not the terms used by the U.S. Census Bureau which is being quoted in the paragraphs you changed. The terms used by Census Bureau are "same-sex" household and "opposite-sex" household. No matter our personal opinion of those issues or the clumsy wording, we are stuck with calling them the same as the Census because we are reporting on what the Census says, not making up our own terms and definitions. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Again greetings. I reverted your repeated edits on Arcata, California, Hyampom, California & Hayfork, California because the terms "homosexual household" and "heterosexual household" are not the terms used by the U.S. Census Bureau. Please refer to this document [[1]] for use of "same-sex" and "opposite-sex" households in use during 2001 Census. It is you who are making a huge assumption here. By your definition, a household of Catholic sisters would be considered "homosexual" and not a "same-sex household." Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:12, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your persistence in changing terminology related to US Census terminology will be reported to an administrator. This kind of effort to change the facts can lead to administrative action and loss of editing privileges. Please consider this before reverting Census terminology again. Wikipedia editors work hard to maintain accuracy, which leaves no room for agendas of specific editors. This is done for the shared goal of having the most accurate encyclopedia possible. Norcalal (talk) 06:38, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring to remove sourced information and introduce your opinion. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elen of the Roads (talk) 21:49, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you for an indefinite period as you edit only intermittently, and might overlook a shorter block. Your repeated removal of information sourced as shown above, and replacement with your opinion of what the wording should be is not acceptable. I note particularly your edit summaries here - that 'kind' of wording of sexuality not in 2000 census 2010 census reword due to political pressure by homosexuals and here - men and women make people and homosexuals should not be in demographics. Wikipedia is not a place to advertise your theories about politics and human sexuality.

If you are able to confirm that you now understand that Wikipedia is based on verifiability of information by use of reliable sources, and you agree not to make further changes to these articles based on your opinion of the matter, then you may request an unblock using the unblock template as outlined in the block notice.Elen of the Roads (talk) 22:02, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]