User talk:Goldboyz

Welcome!

Hi Goldboyz! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

Hello! Goldboyz, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!

Please read Help:Your first article for help in picking a topic to write about and help writing it.

By the way, I moved the draft that you put at User:Goldboyz to your personal sandbox, User:Goldboyz/sandbox. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:05, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:103.223.9.18

A tag has been placed on User talk:103.223.9.18 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Appears to be a test page, content is substantially identical to Draft:Sukhmaneditors

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:12, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple promotional accounts

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts and promotion. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:21, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly either blatant sockpuppetry or promotional collusion. According to the deleted draft (action=submit), "sukhmaneditors" is the subject's Insta and Facebook handles, while "Gold Boyz" is their personal YouTube channel. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:21, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|reason=Your reason here Goldboyz (talk) 17:22, 30 October 2020 (UTC)}[reply]

its not for promotion purpose or any publicity, its only to people get know qbhou it many people have false information qbou it , thats why i posted

That is promotional. But also, it's not why you were blocked. --Yamla (talk) 17:29, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Goldboyz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Goldboyz (talk) 17:24, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:29, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.